Carroll Construction Co. v. Pugh
Carroll Construction Co. v. Pugh
207 So. 2d 276; 1968 Fla. LEXIS 2330
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Carroll Construction Co. v. Pugh
Opinion of the Court
By petition for a writ of certiorari yvt have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 24, 1967.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
It is so ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.