Peacock v. Nims

Supreme Court of Florida
Peacock v. Nims, 207 So. 2d 277 (Fla. 1968)
Adams, Drew, Ervin, Roberts, Thornal

Peacock v. Nims

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 26, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition for certiorari is therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Fred PEACOCK v. John C. NIMS
Status
Published