Gainey v. Woodall
Supreme Court of Florida
Gainey v. Woodall, 207 So. 2d 428 (Fla. 1968)
1968 Fla. LEXIS 2337
Adams, Caldwell, Drew, Ervin, Nal, Thor
Gainey v. Woodall
Opinion of the Court
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida In
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
The motion of petitioner for attorney’s fees in this Court is denied.
It is so ordered.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Hal J. GAINEY v. Morris WOODALL and Corporate Group Service, Inc. and the Florida Industrial Commission
- Status
- Published