Duke v. Stokely-Bordo

Supreme Court of Florida
Duke v. Stokely-Bordo, 209 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 1968)
1968 Fla. LEXIS 2279
Adams, Drew, Ervin, Roberts, Thornal

Duke v. Stokely-Bordo

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 30, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petitions for certiorari and for attorney’s fees are therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Joseph DUKE v. STOKELY-BORDO
Status
Published