Headrick v. Cypress Gardens Citrus Products, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida February 28, 1968

Headrick v. Cypress Gardens Citrus Products, Inc., 210 So. 2d 448 (Fla. 1968)

Adams, Caldwell, Drew, Ervin, Roberts, Spector

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing- date November 30, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney’s fee filed by Petitioner is also denied.

CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur. DREW, J., dissents with opinion.

Dissenting Opinion

DREW, Justice

(dissenting):

I would have argument. Deputy’s order is erroneous as a matter of law because he overlooks statutory definition of accident as including (since Bonnie Gray) “sudden or unexpected result

070rehearing

ON REHEARING GRANTED

PER CURIAM.

After oral argument on rehearing granted, we adhere to our order of February 28, 1968 denying the petition for writ of cer-tiorari.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., ROBERTS, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., and SPECTOR, District Court Judge, concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: Katherine HEADRICK v. CYPRESS GARDENS CITRUS PRODUCTS, INC., Hardware Mutual Insurance Company, and Florida Industrial Commission
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published