Wietz v. Publix Supermarket

Supreme Court of Florida
Wietz v. Publix Supermarket, 212 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 1968)
1968 Fla. LEXIS 2150
Adams, Caldwell, Ervin, Roberts, Thornal

Wietz v. Publix Supermarket

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 26, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that *6there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

Petitioner’s application for attorney’s fees is also denied.

CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Oneida O. WIETZ v. PUBLIX SUPERMARKET, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, and the Florida Industrial Commission
Status
Published