Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Shihada
Supreme Court of Florida
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Shihada, 212 So. 2d 628 (Fla. 1968)
1968 Fla. LEXIS 2167
Caldwell, Ervin, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Shihada
Opinion of the Court
On a prima facie of showing of “conflict jurisdiction” we granted certiorari and have heard oral argument.
The decision under review is Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Shihada, 196 So.2d 14 (3d D.C.A.Fla. 1967). Allegedly it conflicts with Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. Lingle, 133 So.2d 78 (2d D.C.A.Fla. 1961).
On further examination of the record and briefs we have concluded that there is no jurisdictional conflict of decisions. The writ is therefore discharged.
It is so ordered.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, a foreign corp. v. Hasan SHIHADA, Sadat Uthman and Abdel H. Jode
- Status
- Published