Hutson v. State
Hutson v. State
214 So. 2d 343; 1968 Fla. LEXIS 2093
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Hutson v. State
070rehearing
ON REHEARING
We initially denied certiorari. The petition for rehearing convinced us that the writ of certiorari should be granted. The writ issued. We have now heard oral argument and have again carefully considered the record and briefs. We again conclude that there is no jurisdictional conflict of decisions.
The writ which was improvidently issued, is, therefore, discharged.
It is so ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.