Ruth v. Statmaster Corp.

Supreme Court of Florida
Ruth v. Statmaster Corp., 214 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 1968)
1968 Fla. LEXIS 2094
Caldwell, Drew, Ervin, Hopping, Thornal

Ruth v. Statmaster Corp.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 3, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dis*344pensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The motion of petitioner for attorneys’ fees in this Court is denied.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and HOPPING, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
James RUTH v. STATMASTER CORPORATION
Status
Published