Carroll v. Coffield Auto Parts

Supreme Court of Florida September 25, 1968

Carroll v. Coffield Auto Parts, 214 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 1968)

1968 Fla. LEXIS 2105

Caldwell, Ervin, Hopping, Roberts, Thornal

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date April 26, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the es*484sential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

Petitioner’s application for attorney’s fees is also denied.

CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, THORNAL, ERVIN and HOPPING, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: Boyd CARROLL v. COFFIELD AUTO PARTS, Employers Casualty Company, and Florida Industrial Commission
Status: Published