Concreform Co. v. Van Dorn

Supreme Court of Florida October 9, 1968

Concreform Co. v. Van Dorn, 214 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 1968)

1968 Fla. LEXIS 2115

Drew, Ervin, Hopping, Roberts, Thornal

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date April 26, 1968.

*725We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

Accordingly, the petition for certorari is denied.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and HOPPING, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: CONCREFORM COMPANY, Inc. v. John VAN DORN
Status: Published