Boothe v. Pyles

Supreme Court of Florida
Boothe v. Pyles, 215 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1968)
Drew, Ervin, Hopping, Roberts, Thornal

Boothe v. Pyles

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 10, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition for certiorari is therefore denied. Attorney’s fee in the amount of $250.00 is awarded to respondent-claimant’s attorney.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting Chief Justice, and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and HOPPING, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Harry J. BOOTHE v. Houston PYLES
Status
Published