Boothe v. Pyles
Supreme Court of Florida
Boothe v. Pyles, 215 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1968)
Drew, Ervin, Hopping, Roberts, Thornal
Boothe v. Pyles
Opinion of the Court
By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 10, 1968.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition for certiorari is therefore denied. Attorney’s fee in the amount of $250.00 is awarded to respondent-claimant’s attorney.
It is so ordered.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Harry J. BOOTHE v. Houston PYLES
- Status
- Published