Harbour House Valet Shop v. DeLima

Supreme Court of Florida
Harbour House Valet Shop v. DeLima, 215 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 1968)
1968 Fla. LEXIS 2049
Caldwell, Drew, Hopping, Roberts, Thornal

Harbour House Valet Shop v. DeLima

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date May 29, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition and cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.

The respondent’s petition for allowance of an attorney’s fee is hereby granted in the amount of $250.00.

CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and HOPPING, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
HARBOUR HOUSE VALET SHOP, and Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance Company, and v. Idelina E. DeLIMA and the Florida Industrial Commission, and
Status
Published