Supreme Court of Florida, 1968

Paul v. Daytona Beach Racing & Recreational Facilities District

Paul v. Daytona Beach Racing & Recreational Facilities District
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided September 24, 1968 · Adams, Adkins, Boyd, Caldwell, Carlton, Drew, Ervin, Mason, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal
224 So. 2d 299; 1968 Fla. LEXIS 1962 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Paul v. Daytona Beach Racing & Recreational Facilities District

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on Petition for Writ of Certiorari, jurisdictional briefs and portions of the record deemed necessary to reflect jurisdiction under Florida Appellate Rule 4.5, subd. c(6), 32 F.S.A., and it appearing to the Court that it is without jurisdiction, it is ordered that the Petition for Writ of Certiorari be and the same is hereby denied, Fla.App., 208 So.2d 653.

*300THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur. CALDWELL, C. J., and DREW and ADAMS, JJ., dissent.

070rehearing

ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

After oral argument on rehearing granted, we adhere to our order of September 24, 1968, denying the petition for writ of certiorari.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., and MASON, Circuit Judge, concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.