State v. Shively

Supreme Court of Florida
State v. Shively, 219 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 1969)
Adkins, Boyd, Carlton, Drew, Thornal

State v. Shively

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date of October 24, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

Attorney’s fees in the sum of $250.00 are hereby awarded respondent for the services of its attorney herein.

DREW, Acting C. J., and THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE of Florida, Florida Citrus Experiment Station v. Billy George SHIVELY (Deceased) Sylvia B. Shively and Florida Industrial Commission
Status
Published