Haynes Painting & Decorating v. Mosley

Supreme Court of Florida
Haynes Painting & Decorating v. Mosley, 220 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1969)
1969 Fla. LEXIS 2404
Adkins, Carlton, Drew, Roberts, Thornal

Haynes Painting & Decorating v. Mosley

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari, we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date December 4, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petitions, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition for certiorari is therefore denied.

Attorneys’ fees in the amount of $250.00 are awarded to respondent-Lora Mosley’s attorneys.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, CARLTON and ADKINS, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
HAYNES PAINTING & DECORATING and Phoenix Assurance Company v. Lora MOSLEY and the Florida Industrial Commission
Status
Published