Haynes Painting & Decorating v. Mosley
Supreme Court of Florida
Haynes Painting & Decorating v. Mosley, 220 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1969)
1969 Fla. LEXIS 2404
Adkins, Carlton, Drew, Roberts, Thornal
Haynes Painting & Decorating v. Mosley
Opinion of the Court
By petition for writ of certiorari, we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date December 4, 1968.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petitions, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition for certiorari is therefore denied.
Attorneys’ fees in the amount of $250.00 are awarded to respondent-Lora Mosley’s attorneys.
It is so ordered.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- HAYNES PAINTING & DECORATING and Phoenix Assurance Company v. Lora MOSLEY and the Florida Industrial Commission
- Status
- Published