Reitz v. Atlantic National Bank of West Palm Beach

Supreme Court of Florida April 9, 1969

Reitz v. Atlantic National Bank of West Palm Beach, 221 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 1969)

1969 Fla. LEXIS 2376

Adkins, Boyd, Drew, Ervin, Roberts

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 19, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dis*134pensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied. The petitioner’s motion for attorney’s fees is also denied.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: Madeline F. REITZ v. ATLANTIC NATIONAL BANK OF WEST PALM BEACH, U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Company and the Florida Industrial Commission
Status: Published