Clements v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Supreme Court of Florida April 23, 1969

Clements v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 221 So. 2d 738 (Fla. 1969)

1969 Fla. LEXIS 2399

Adkins, Boyd, Carlton, Drew, Ervin

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 25, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that *739there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied. Petitioner’s motion for attorney’s fees is also denied.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: Phillip CLEMENTS v. The GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, Inc., and the Full Florida Industrial Commission
Status: Published