Supreme Court of Florida, 1969

R. A. M., Inc. v. Bailey

R. A. M., Inc. v. Bailey
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided April 30, 1969 · Adkins, Boyd, Drew, Ervin, Roberts
222 So. 2d 2; 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2317 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

R. A. M., Inc. v. Bailey

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date December 24, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

Attorneys for respondent, Bailey, are awarded a fee of $250.00 for services in this Court.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.