Armstrong v. W. L. Cobb Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Florida
Armstrong v. W. L. Cobb Construction Co., 222 So. 2d 729 (Fla. 1969)
1969 Fla. LEXIS 2354
Adkins, Boyd, Carlton, Drew, Thornal

Armstrong v. W. L. Cobb Construction Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date December 3, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petitions, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petitions are therefore denied.

*730Petitioner’s application for attorney s fees is also denied.

DREW, Acting C. J., and THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Robert Lee ARMSTRONG v. W. L. COBB CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and the Florida Industrial Commission
Status
Published