State v. Ramos

Supreme Court of Florida
State v. Ramos, 224 So. 2d 276 (Fla. 1969)
1969 Fla. LEXIS 2227
Caldwell, Drew, Ervin, Thomas, Thornal

State v. Ramos

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The record in the instant case is in substantially the same condition as the record in State v. Kahler, 224 So.2d 272 (filed May 28, 1969, Fla.). For the reason there announced this cause is similarly temporarily remanded to the trial judge for the entry of an order in accord with our directive in Kahler, supra.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, THOMAS, (Retired) and CALDWELL, (Retired), JJ., concur.

070rehearing

On Petition for Rehearing

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellant’s petition for rehearing and/or modification, it is ordered that said petition be and the same is hereby denied.

DREW, THORNAL, THOMAS (Retired) and CALDWELL (Retired), JJ., concur. ERVIN, C. J., concurs specially with opinion.

Concurring Opinion

ERVIN, Chief Justice

(concurring specially) :

I agree to the denial of the State’s petition for rehearing and/or modification for the reasons set forth in my specially concurring opinion in the case of State v. Kahler, 224 So.2d 272, filed this date.

Reference

Full Case Name
The STATE of Florida v. Ibrahim RAMOS
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published