Supreme Court of Florida, 1969

Crown Hotel Operating Co. v. Haynes

Crown Hotel Operating Co. v. Haynes
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided June 25, 1969 · Adkins, Boyd, Carlton, Drew, Ervin
224 So. 2d 288; 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2236 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Crown Hotel Operating Co. v. Haynes

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 12, 1969.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petitions, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees filed by Respondent cross-petitioner is granted in the amount of $250.00.

ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.