Spell v. Tompkins-Beckwith, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida
Spell v. Tompkins-Beckwith, Inc., 224 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 1969)
1969 Fla. LEXIS 2260
Boyd, Carlton, Drew, Ervin, Roberts

Spell v. Tompkins-Beckwith, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date May 2, 1969.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Raymond SPELL v. TOMPKINS-BECKWITH, INC. and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Status
Published