Supreme Court of Florida, 1969

Hanemann v. State

Supreme Court of Florida · Decided November 25, 1969 · No. 38677 · Adkins, Boyd, Drew, Ervin, Roberts

228 So. 2d 382; 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2111 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Martin v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)
Perkins v. State (Fla. 1969)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Writ of certiorari having heretofore issued, argument having been heard, and the court having examined the record and briefs, it appears that the writ was improvidently issued. Accordingly, the writ of certiorari heretofore issued in this cause is discharged. See State v. Lowe, 130 So. 2d 288 (Fla.App. 1961).

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur. DREW, J., dissents with opinion.

Dissenting Opinion

DREW, Justice

(dissenting).

I dissent. I am in complete agreement with the views expressed and the judgment reached by Judge Rawls in his dissenting opinion in the district court, appearing at 221 So.2d 230.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.