Supreme Court of Florida, 1969

Hanemann v. State

Hanemann v. State
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided November 25, 1969 · Adkins, Boyd, Drew, Ervin, Roberts
228 So. 2d 382; 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2111 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Hanemann v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Writ of certiorari having heretofore issued, argument having been heard, and the court having examined the record and briefs, it appears that the writ was improvidently issued. Accordingly, the writ of certiorari heretofore issued in this cause is discharged. See State v. Lowe, 130 So. 2d 288 (Fla.App. 1961).

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur. DREW, J., dissents with opinion.

Dissenting Opinion

DREW, Justice

(dissenting).

I dissent. I am in complete agreement with the views expressed and the judgment reached by Judge Rawls in his dissenting opinion in the district court, appearing at 221 So.2d 230.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.