Frischkorn v. Frischkorn

Supreme Court of Florida
Frischkorn v. Frischkorn, 228 So. 2d 909 (Fla. 1969)
1969 Fla. LEXIS 2122
Adkins, Boyd, Drew, Ervin, Mann

Frischkorn v. Frischkorn

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ -and have heard argu*910ment of the parties. After argument and 'upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued. Therefore, the writ is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

The Motion for Attorney’s Fees is hereby granted in the amount of $350.00.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., DREW, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., and MANN, District Court Judge, concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
David E. K. FRISCHKORN v. Thomasine G. FRISCHKORN
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published