Doral Country Club Inc. v. Schmidt

Supreme Court of Florida
Doral Country Club Inc. v. Schmidt, 229 So. 2d 838 (Fla. 1969)
1969 Fla. LEXIS 2550
Adkins, Boyd, Carlton, Ervin, Thornal

Doral Country Club Inc. v. Schmidt

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission hearing date June 27, 1969.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petitions for attorneys’ fees filed by respondents Mary and Frank Schmidt are each granted in the amount of $250.00.

ERVIN, C. J., and THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ„ concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
DORAL COUNTRY CLUB INC. v. Mary B. SCHMIDT, (Widow), Paul Schmidt (Minor Son) and The Florida Industrial Commission
Status
Published