Lee v. Morrison Cafeterias Consolidated, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida
Lee v. Morrison Cafeterias Consolidated, Inc., 231 So. 2d 220 (Fla. 1969)
Adkins, Boyd, Carlton, Drew, Mann, Only, Roberts, Thorn

Lee v. Morrison Cafeterias Consolidated, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. After argument and upon further consideration, we have determined the writ was improvidently issued. The writ must be and is discharged and the petition is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., and MANN, District Court Judge, concur. THORN AL, J., agrees to conclusion only. DREW and CARLTON, JJ., dissent.

070rehearing

ON REHEARING GRANTED

PER CURIAM.

A rehearing having been granted in this cause and the case having been further considered upon the record and the briefs of the respective parties, the order dismissing the petition filed November 12, 1969 is hereby adhered to on rehearing.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., DREW, THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., and MANN, District Court Judge, concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Ruth Q. LEE, as Administratrix of the Estate of Ethel Q. Gorman v. MORRISON CAFETERIAS CONSOLIDATED, INC., a corporation
Status
Published