Supreme Court of Florida, 1971

Investment Corp. of South Florida v. City of Hallandale

Supreme Court of Florida · Decided February 3, 1971 · Adkins, Boyd, Carlton, Ervin, Roberts

245 So. 2d 253; 1971 Fla. LEXIS 3968 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

Rushfeldt v. Metropolitan Dade County (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Pomerance v. Homosassa Special Water Dist. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Madison County v. Foxx (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Davis Water & Waste Industries, Inc. v. Embry Development Corp. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Home Builders v. Board of County Commissioners (Florida Circuit Courts 1982)
Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now v. City of Florida City (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, having certified to us that its decision in the cases of City of Hallandale v. Meekins et al., and City of Hallandale v. Investment Corporation of South Florida (Fla.App. 1970), 237 So.2d 318, passes upon a question of great public interest, we accepted jurisdiction for review pursuant to Article V, Section 4(2) of the Florida Constitution, F.S.A.

After hearing oral argument and carefully reviewing the briefs and the record, we have come to the conclusion that the decision of the District Court is correct and we adopt it as the decision of this

*254Court. The writ, therefore, is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur. CARLTON, J., dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.