Supreme Court of Florida, 1972

Gable v. Silver

Gable v. Silver
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided July 5, 1972 · Per Curiam
264 So. 2d 418 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Gable v. Silver

Cases that cite this one

23 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

264 So.2d 418 (1972)

David GABLE, Petitioner,
v.
David SILVER et al., Respondents.

No. 42149.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 5, 1972.

Earl Faircloth and Robert M. Sturrup, of Faircloth, Sturrup & Della-Donna, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Merle Litman, of Litman & Muchnick, Hollywood, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, reported at 258 So.2d 11. The District Court has certified its decision as one passing on a question of great public interest, to-wit:

"Do implied warranties of fitness and merchantability extend to the purchasers of new condominium homes from builder-sellers."

*419 After argument and upon consideration of the record and briefs, we hold that the District Court of Appeal has correctly decided the cause and its decision is adopted as the ruling of this Court.

Accordingly, certiorari is discharged.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C.J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.