Grainger v. Capital National Bank of Tampa

Supreme Court of Florida February 25, 1972

Grainger v. Capital National Bank of Tampa, 259 So. 2d 165 (Fla. 1972)

Adkins, Boyd, Carlton, Dekle, Ervin, McCain, Roberts

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. After oral argument and upon further consideration, we have determined the writ was improvidently issued.

The writ must be and is discharged and the petition is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur. ROBERTS, C. J., and DEKLE, J., dissent.

Reference

Full Case Name: Floyd GRAINGER v. CAPITAL NATIONAL BANK OF TAMPA, a national banking corporation
Status: Published