Florida East Coast Railroad v. Eckersen

Supreme Court of Florida April 19, 1972

Florida East Coast Railroad v. Eckersen, 261 So. 2d 818 (Fla. 1972)

1972 Fla. LEXIS 3821

Boyd, Carlton, Dekle, Ervin, McCain

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court and the writ of certiorari issued. After argument and upon further examination of the record and briefs in this case, we conclude that there is no conflict justifying the exercise of jurisdiction by this Court. Therefore, the petition for writ of certio-rari is dismissed and the writ is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, BOYD, and McCAIN, JJ., concur. DEKLE, J., dissents.

Reference

Full Case Name: FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILROAD COMPANY, a Florida Corporation and Roy D. Domingus, Jr. v. Patricia Ann ECKERSEN, etc.
Status: Published