Palladino v. Turner

Supreme Court of Florida
Palladino v. Turner, 263 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 1972)
1972 Fla. LEXIS 3594
Carlton, Dekle, Ervin, McCain, Roberts

Palladino v. Turner

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus, the brief of petitioner, and the return of the respondent, we conclude that the alternative writ should be discharged without prejudice. Petitioner *207may reapply for bail pending appeal in accord with the standards enunciated in Younghans v. State, 90 So.2d 308 (Fla. 1956) and F.A.R. 6.15(b), 32 F.S.A.; however, on reapplication petitioner remains subject to existing statutory limitations on bail, including Fla.Stat. § 903.132, F.S.A., as may be applicable.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
William PALLADINO v. Honorable Jack M. TURNER, as Judge of the Criminal Court of Record, Dade County, Florida
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published