Supreme Court of Florida, 1972

Nuno v. Balz

Nuno v. Balz
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided June 28, 1972 · Adkins, Boyd, Carlton, Ervin, Roberts
265 So. 2d 10; 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3484 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Nuno v. Balz

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. *11We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued. Therefore, the writ is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON and ADKINS, JJ., concur. BOYD, J., dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.