State v. Davis

Supreme Court of Florida
State v. Davis, 269 So. 2d 664 (Fla. 1972)
Boyd, Cain, Carlton, Dekle, Ervin, Lee, Roberts

State v. Davis

Dissenting Opinion

DEKLE, Justice

(dissenting):

I respectfully dissent in accord with the clear analysis expressed in the dissent of Judge Wigginton to the district court opinion.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, CARLTON, BOYD and Mc-CAIN, JJ., and LEE, Circuit Judge, concur. DEKLE, J., dissents with opinion. ROBERTS, C. J., dissents and agrees with DEKLE, J.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE of Florida v. W. E. \Bill\" DAVIS"
Status
Published