State ex rel. Keegan v. Sandstrom

Supreme Court of Florida
State ex rel. Keegan v. Sandstrom, 276 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 1973)
1973 Fla. LEXIS 4600
Cain, Carlton, Dekle, Ervin, Roberts

State ex rel. Keegan v. Sandstrom

Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Justice

(dissenting) :

The sufficiency of an application for bail pending appeal is to be tested by applying the principles laid down in Young-*473hans v. State, Fla., 90 So.2d 308. See Florida Appellate Rule 6.15, 32 F.S.A. Under the facts here presented I believe the petitioner is entitled to bail pending appeal and I would, therefore, treat the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as a Petition for Writ of Conflict Certiorari, issue the Writ and quash the decision below.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE of Florida ex rel. William W. KEEGAN v. Jack SANDSTROM, Warden, Dade County Jail
Status
Published