Supreme Court of Florida, 1973

State ex rel. Keegan v. Sandstrom

State ex rel. Keegan v. Sandstrom
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided April 16, 1973 · Cain, Carlton, Dekle, Ervin, Roberts
276 So. 2d 472; 1973 Fla. LEXIS 4600 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

State ex rel. Keegan v. Sandstrom

Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Justice

(dissenting) :

The sufficiency of an application for bail pending appeal is to be tested by applying the principles laid down in Young-*473hans v. State, Fla., 90 So.2d 308. See Florida Appellate Rule 6.15, 32 F.S.A. Under the facts here presented I believe the petitioner is entitled to bail pending appeal and I would, therefore, treat the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as a Petition for Writ of Conflict Certiorari, issue the Writ and quash the decision below.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.