Swiontek v. Walton

Supreme Court of Florida
Swiontek v. Walton, 283 So. 2d 359 (Fla. 1973)
1973 Fla. LEXIS 4388
Adkins, Boyd, Carlton, Dekle, McCain

Swiontek v. Walton

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consid*360eration of the matter, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Edwin S. SWIONTEK v. William R. WALTON, M.D.
Status
Published