Gustafson v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Gustafson v. State, 287 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 1973)
Adkins, Boyd, Carlton, Dekle, Ervin, McCain, Roberts

Gustafson v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari directed to the 4th District’s opinion reported at 273 So.2d 86 (1973), reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3) (1973), Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby

Discharged.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur. ERVIN and McCAIN, JJ., dissent.

Reference

Full Case Name
James E. GUSTAFSON v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published