Citizens & Peoples National Bank of Pensacola v. Pate

Supreme Court of Florida
Citizens & Peoples National Bank of Pensacola v. Pate, 289 So. 2d 711 (Fla. 1973)
1973 Fla. LEXIS 3977
Adkins, Boyd, Carlton, Dekle, Ervin, McCain, Roberts

Citizens & Peoples National Bank of Pensacola v. Pate

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur. CARLTON, C. J., and McCAIN and DEKLE, JT., dissent.

Reference

Full Case Name
The CITIZENS & PEOPLES NATIONAL BANK OF PENSACOLA, etc. v. Lennie Elizabeth PATE
Status
Published