Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Florida, 1974

Hazen v. State

Hazen v. State
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided May 16, 1974 · Adkins, Boyd, Dekle, England, Ervin, Harding, Overton, Roberts, Rudd
326 So. 2d 6; 1974 Fla. LEXIS 4926 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Hazen v. State

Opinion of the Court

*7ON REHEARING GRANTED

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the cause, we conclude that no direct conflict of decisions exists as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, OVERTON and ENGLAND, JJ., and RUDD, Circuit Judge, concur. ADKINS, C. J., BOYD, J., and HARDING, Circuit Judge, dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑