State v. Papp
State v. Papp
Opinion of the Court
SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION
We have before us a petition of the Attorney General seeking further review of State v. Papp reported at 298 So.2d 374 (Fla. 1974). The petition was filed in compliance with a suggestion for such review contained in a Memorandum Opinion and Order of the United States District Court, Middle District of Florida.
This determination is made without prejudice to Respondent-Appellant Papp, thus allowing him to seek post-conviction relief either under Rule 3.850, Rules of Criminal Procedure, or pursuant to a petition for habeas corpus filed in the appropriate court.
In passing we note that we are currently considering Fontana v. State, Fla., 316 So.2d 545, in which we have under review “Memoirs”,
The petition for reconsideration of these consolidated cases is visited to the original opinion and is hereby
Denied.
. 418 U.S. 87, 94 S.Ct. 2887, 41 L.Ed.2d 590 (1974).
. 418 U.S. 153, 94 S.Ct. 2750, 41 L.Ed.2d 642 (1974).
. A Book Named “John Cleland’s Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure” v. Attorney General, 383 U.S. 413, 86 S.Ct. 975, 16 L.Ed.2d 1 (1966).
. Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607, 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- STATE of Florida v. Balint PAPP
- Status
- Published