Buckeye Holding Co. v. Kelly
Buckeye Holding Co. v. Kelly
Opinion of the Court
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further careful consideration of the matter, the briefs and record, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution (1973). Accordingly, the writ must be and is hereby discharged, Fla.App., 297 So.2d 869.
It is so ordered.
Concurring Opinion
(concurring specially).
I have concurred in the judgment discharging the writ of certiorari for lack of conflict jurisdiction in this Court. In this posture, the case will be remanded for
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.