State v. Nordone

Supreme Court of Florida
State v. Nordone, 342 So. 2d 811 (Fla. 1976)
1976 Fla. LEXIS 4625
Adkins, Boyd, England, Hatchett, Overton, Roberts, Sundberg

State v. Nordone

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court, and we issued the writ. Upon further consideration, however, we have determined that we are without • jurisdiction in this cause. The writ is therefore discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari dismissed.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ENGLAND, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., concur. ROBERTS, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., dissent.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE of Florida v. Robert Randolph NORDONE
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published