State v. Omasta
State v. Omasta
342 So. 2d 505; 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3814
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
State v. Omasta
Opinion of the Court
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ. Upon further consideration of the cause, we conclude that no direct conflict of decisions exists as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.
It is so ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.