Schaming v. Simkins Industries, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida March 10, 1977

Schaming v. Simkins Industries, Inc., 343 So. 2d 834 (Fla. 1977)

1977 Fla. LEXIS 3844

Adkins, Boyd, England, Hatchett, Karl, Overton, Sundberg

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ. Upon further consideration of the cause, we conclude that no direct conflict of decisions exists as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur. BOYD, J., dissents.

Reference

Full Case Name: Ronald SCHAMING and Loretta Schaming, Individually and as husband and wife v. SIMKINS INDUSTRIES, INC., a Connecticut Corporation, and John Sweeney
Status: Published