Exchange National Bank of Tampa v. Schooley

Supreme Court of Florida March 16, 1978

Exchange National Bank of Tampa v. Schooley, 356 So. 2d 786 (Fla. 1978)

1978 Fla. LEXIS 4745

Adkins, Boyd, England, Hatchett, Karl, Overton, Sundberg

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ. Upon further consideration of the cause, we conclude that no direct conflict of decisions exists as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur. ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., dissent.

Reference

Full Case Name: EXCHANGE NATIONAL BANK OF TAMPA v. Harry SCHOOLEY
Status: Published