Young v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Young v. State, 360 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 1978)
1978 Fla. LEXIS 4838
Adkins, Boyd, Hatchett, Overton, Sundberg

Young v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The petition for certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ.

Upon further consideration of the cause and our recent opinion in Henry v. State, Case No. 52,705, 359 So.2d 864 (Fla., filed June 1, 1978), we conclude that no direct conflict of decisions exists as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
James E. YOUNG v. STATE of Florida
Status
Published