Ingram v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Ingram v. State, 369 So. 2d 948 (Fla. 1979)
1979 Fla. LEXIS 4638
Adkins, Alderman, Boyd, England, Hatchett, Overton, Sundberg

Ingram v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ. Upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by article V, section (3)(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
James W. INGRAM, Jr. v. STATE of Florida
Status
Published