Bozeman v. State
Bozeman v. State
371 So. 2d 84; 1979 Fla. LEXIS 4657
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Bozeman v. State
Opinion of the Court
The order of the trial court denying the motion to dismiss is affirmed. See State v. Allen, 362 So.2d 10 (Fla. 1978); State v. Belgrave, 364 So.2d 1225 (Fla. 1978). In so ruling, however, the trial judge erroneously concluded that the theft statute does not require proof of scienter for a conviction and thus precluded appellants from offering evidence tending to negate any guilty knowledge on their part. Accordingly, this ease is remanded to the trial court so that appellants may be provided an opportunity to withdraw their no contest pleas and proceed in a manner consistent with this opinion.
It is so ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.