Malone v. Citizens & Peoples National Bank of Pensacola

Supreme Court of Florida November 21, 1979

Malone v. Citizens & Peoples National Bank of Pensacola, 377 So. 2d 166 (Fla. 1979)

1979 Fla. LEXIS 4876

Adkins, Alderman, Boyd, England, McDonald, Overton, Sundberg

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We find appellants’ constitutional argument to be without merit. See City of New Orleans v. Dukes, 421 U.S. 297, 96 S.Ct. 2513, 49 L.Ed.2d 511 (1976); Katzenbach v. Morgan, 384 U.S. 641, 86 S.Ct. 1717, 16 L.Ed.2d 828 (1966); Williamson v. Lee Optical Co., 348 U.S. 483, 75 S.Ct. 461, 99 L.Ed. 563 (1955); Lasky v. State Farm Insurance Co., 296 So.2d 9 (Fla. 1974); Winner v. Westwood, 273 So.2d 151 (Fla. 1970); Rodriquez v. Jones, 64 So.2d 278 (Fla. 1953). We have also reviewed the other issues raised by appellants and find them to be without merit.

The order of the court below is, therefore, affirmed.

It is so ordered.

ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, SUNDBERG, ALDERMAN and McDonald, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: Harvey R. MALONE et ux. v. CITIZENS & PEOPLES NATIONAL BANK OF PENSACOLA, etc.
Status: Published